The film could have been a disaster instead, it was a triumph.
#What is the guy who played in the mummy movies movie
His first major movie role was in Encino Man in which he played Link, a frozen caveman who gets de-thawed by Shore (playing a character named “Stoney”) and Sean Astin. But alas, he came of age in Hollywood during the 90s and a creature of the 90s he remains.ĭuring that decade, Brendan Fraser ruled, appearing in films opposite other 90s icons like Pauly Shore, Adam Sandler, Ricki Lake, Joe Pesci and Alicia Silverstone. After the time for being a matinee idol had passed, he could have easily slipped into character work. Plus, he would have looked great in black and white. What if he had been alive during the height of screwball comedies? With his lanky frame, earnest demeanor, remarkable physicality and comedic skills, he would have been the perfect foil for actresses like Barbara Stanwyck and Katharine Hepburn. Perhaps Fraser would have been better suited to a different era of filmmaking. Ironic that this versatility has proved to be a hindrance instead of an asset in his later years. Because of his adaptability, it is difficult to categorize Fraser in any one type of role-he looks at ease whether he’s playing a Neanderthal or a Harvard man. Sure, some films were more successful than others, but Fraser’s unquestionable screen presence made them all watchable. In his hey day, he played roles as varied as a caveman, student (twice), rocker, athlete, war veteran (twice), millionaire set of twins, and a Canadian Mountie. One reason that he attained this status was his incredible aptitude for sincerity that has endeared him to audiences throughout his eclectic career. That’s right, a bondafide, and totally legit movie star. Whatever your opinion of Brendan Fraser might be, there is one fact that is undeniable: he used to be a movie star. Unless, that is, we have a financial interest in the sequel set up by Jekyll’s longer-than-necessary final voiceover.When you hear the name “Brendan Fraser,” what’s the first thing you think of? Is it the rubber-faced, tenderhearted comedian featured in films like Bedazzled or Blast From the Past? Or maybe you think of the brooding intellectual seen in movies like With Honors and School Ties? Or perhaps you fondly remember him as the loveable goofball in comedies like George of the Jungle and yes even, Dudley Do-Right? No, most likely you think of him in the present day: a middle-aged actor, fighting a paunch and hair loss, bouncing back and forth between different kid movies and “dad” roles, no longer fit for the role of “action hero.”Īnd that’s a shame. It’s the kickoff of a climax that requires more heroic self-sacrifice from Morton than we have any reason to believe he’s capable of. But that sequence lasts just a minute or two, and is immediately followed by a Morton/Mummy standoff in which Cruise fails, rather spectacularly, to wring a laugh out of a kiss-off line one hopes neither Koepp, nor McQuarrie, nor Kussman would admit to having written. The most involving scene by far shows Morton swimming through underwater crypts, trying to save Halsey from Ahmanet before he either drowns or is destroyed by the zombie warriors swimming behind him. So much of the action takes place in monotonous half-light so little of it displays even the ambition to show audiences something new - unless we count the Mummy’s eyes, which have two irises each, for no apparent reason other than somebody thought that would look cool on a movie poster.
What is surprising is that this film’s action makes one slightly nostalgic for the 1999 incarnation, or at least prompts one to ask if it wasn’t maybe more fun than we gave it credit for. “It’s no surprise that the action to come has vastly more in common with the CGI bombast of the Brendan Fraser-starring Mummy films than the quiet, slow-creeping horror of the version Karl Freund directed in 1932.
0 kommentar(er)
